Hi Thomas and Maxime, thanks for the answer,
On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 10:10:55AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 10:09:46PM +0100, Andi Shyti wrote: > > This is the second time I am resending this series in its v2. It > > has been reviewd, acked, blessed, discussed, rectified, assessed, > > authorized, validated, glorified, praised, demanded, approved, > > and yet, I don't understand why no one is merging it. > > $ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f drivers/gpu/drm/i915/ > Jani Nikula <[email protected]> (supporter:INTEL DRM DRIVERS > (excluding Poulsbo, Moorestow...) > Joonas Lahtinen <[email protected]> (supporter:INTEL DRM > DRIVERS (excluding Poulsbo, Moorestow...) > Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]> (supporter:INTEL DRM DRIVERS (excluding > Poulsbo, Moorestow...) > Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]> (supporter:INTEL DRM DRIVERS > (excluding Poulsbo, Moorestow...) > David Airlie <[email protected]> (maintainer:DRM DRIVERS) > Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> (maintainer:DRM DRIVERS) > [email protected] (open list:INTEL DRM DRIVERS (excluding > Poulsbo, Moorestow...) > [email protected] (open list:DRM DRIVERS) > [email protected] (open list) > > You've Cc'd none of the i915 maintainers, that's why it's been stuck. > > Jani, Joonas, Rodrigo, Tvrtko, could you have a look at this? The main change here is in drm_print.h, though and there is just an example of usage in i915. I though this should go through the drm branch. Is it OK if I push it in drm-intel-next? Thanks, Andi
