Hi Andy,

Am Mittwoch, 22. November 2023, 13:55:44 CET schrieb Andy Yan:
> From: Andy Yan <[email protected]>
> 
> VOP2 on rk3588:
> 
> Four video ports:
> VP0 Max 4096x2160
> VP1 Max 4096x2160
> VP2 Max 4096x2160
> VP3 Max 2048x1080
> 
> 4 4K Cluster windows with AFBC/line RGB and AFBC-only YUV support
> 4 4K Esmart windows with line RGB/YUV support
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <[email protected]>
> 
> ---
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - add rk3588_ prefix for functions which are rk3588 only
> - make some calculation as fixed value and keep calculation formula as
>   comment
> - check return value for some cru calculation functions.
> - check return value for syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle
> - add NV20/NV30 for esmart plane
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c | 381 ++++++++++++++++++-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.h |  66 ++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_vop2_reg.c | 221 +++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 660 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c
> index 4bcc405bcf11..9eecbe1f71f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c

> @@ -271,9 +282,12 @@ static bool vop2_cluster_window(const struct vop2_win 
> *win)
>  static void vop2_cfg_done(struct vop2_video_port *vp)
>  {
>       struct vop2 *vop2 = vp->vop2;
> +     u32 val;
> +
> +     val = BIT(vp->id) | (BIT(vp->id) << 16) |
> +             RK3568_REG_CFG_DONE__GLB_CFG_DONE_EN;
>  
> -     regmap_set_bits(vop2->map, RK3568_REG_CFG_DONE,
> -                     BIT(vp->id) | RK3568_REG_CFG_DONE__GLB_CFG_DONE_EN);
> +     regmap_set_bits(vop2->map, RK3568_REG_CFG_DONE, val);

I don't fully understand that code:
(1) the write mask is also present on the rk3568, so should this change
    be a separate patch with a fixes tag?
(2) RK3568_REG_CFG_DONE__GLB_CFG_DONE_EN does not contain the part for
    the write-mask

        #define RK3568_REG_CFG_DONE__GLB_CFG_DONE_EN     BIT(15)

    why is this working then?

>  }
>  
>  static void vop2_win_disable(struct vop2_win *win)

[...]

> @@ -1298,7 +1346,11 @@ static void vop2_plane_atomic_update(struct drm_plane 
> *plane,
>                       vop2_win_write(win, VOP2_WIN_AFBC_ENABLE, 1);
>               vop2_win_write(win, VOP2_WIN_AFBC_FORMAT, afbc_format);
>               vop2_win_write(win, VOP2_WIN_AFBC_UV_SWAP, uv_swap);
> -             vop2_win_write(win, VOP2_WIN_AFBC_AUTO_GATING_EN, 0);
> +             if (vop2->data->soc_id == 3566 || vop2->data->soc_id == 3568)
> +                     vop2_win_write(win, VOP2_WIN_AFBC_AUTO_GATING_EN, 0);
> +             else
> +                     vop2_win_write(win, VOP2_WIN_AFBC_AUTO_GATING_EN, 1);
> +

I think this at least warrants a comment, what is happening here. Also,
can you already see how future vop2-users are behaving - aka are all new
socs in the "else" part of the conditional, or would a switch-case better
represent future socs?


>               vop2_win_write(win, VOP2_WIN_AFBC_BLOCK_SPLIT_EN, 0);
>               transform_offset = vop2_afbc_transform_offset(pstate, 
> half_block_en);
>               vop2_win_write(win, VOP2_WIN_AFBC_HDR_PTR, yrgb_mst);


> @@ -1627,9 +1937,17 @@ static void vop2_crtc_atomic_enable(struct drm_crtc 
> *crtc,
>       drm_for_each_encoder_mask(encoder, crtc->dev, crtc_state->encoder_mask) 
> {
>               struct rockchip_encoder *rkencoder = 
> to_rockchip_encoder(encoder);
>  
> -             rk3568_set_intf_mux(vp, rkencoder->crtc_endpoint_id, polflags);
> +             /*
> +              * for drive a high resolution(4KP120, 8K), vop on 
> rk3588/rk3576 need
> +              * process multi(1/2/4/8) pixels per cycle, so the dclk feed by 
> the
> +              * system cru may be the 1/2 or 1/4 of mode->clock.
> +              */
> +             clock = vop2_set_intf_mux(vp, rkencoder->crtc_endpoint_id, 
> polflags);
>       }
>  
> +     if (!clock)
> +             return;
> +

hmm, shouldn't the check for the validity of a mode happen before
atomic_enable is run? So this shouldn't error out in the middle of the
function?


>       if (vcstate->output_mode == ROCKCHIP_OUT_MODE_AAAA &&
>           !(vp_data->feature & VOP_FEATURE_OUTPUT_10BIT))
>               out_mode = ROCKCHIP_OUT_MODE_P888;


Thanks
Heiko


Reply via email to