On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 13:55:21 +0800
kernel test robot <[email protected]> wrote:

> tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git 
> master
> head:   305230142ae0637213bf6e04f6d9f10bbcb74af8
> commit: c0a581d7126c0bbc96163276f585fd7b4e4d8d0e tracing: Disable interrupt 
> or preemption before acquiring arch_spinlock_t
> date:   1 year, 1 month ago
> config: loongarch-randconfig-r123-20231107 
> (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231108/[email protected]/config)
> compiler: loongarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
> reproduce: 
> (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231108/[email protected]/reproduce)
> 
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version 
> of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
> | Closes: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/[email protected]/
> 
> sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>    kernel/trace/trace.c:406:28: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 
> (different address spaces) @@     expected struct trace_export **list @@     
> got struct trace_export [noderef] __rcu ** @@
>    kernel/trace/trace.c:406:28: sparse:     expected struct trace_export 
> **list
>    kernel/trace/trace.c:406:28: sparse:     got struct trace_export [noderef] 
> __rcu **
>    kernel/trace/trace.c:420:33: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 
> (different address spaces) @@     expected struct trace_export **list @@     
> got struct trace_export [noderef] __rcu ** @@
>    kernel/trace/trace.c:420:33: sparse:     expected struct trace_export 
> **list
>    kernel/trace/trace.c:420:33: sparse:     got struct trace_export [noderef] 
> __rcu **
> >> kernel/trace/trace.c:2430:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 
> >> (different address spaces) @@     expected void *ptr @@     got unsigned 
> >> int [noderef] __percpu * @@  
>    kernel/trace/trace.c:2430:9: sparse:     expected void *ptr
>    kernel/trace/trace.c:2430:9: sparse:     got unsigned int [noderef] 
> __percpu *
> >> kernel/trace/trace.c:2430:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 
> >> (different address spaces) @@     expected void *ptr @@     got unsigned 
> >> int [noderef] __percpu * @@  
>    kernel/trace/trace.c:2430:9: sparse:     expected void *ptr
>    kernel/trace/trace.c:2430:9: sparse:     got unsigned int [noderef] 
> __percpu *
> >> kernel/trace/trace.c:2430:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 
> >> (different address spaces) @@     expected void *ptr @@     got unsigned 
> >> int [noderef] __percpu * @@  
>    kernel/trace/trace.c:2430:9: sparse:     expected void *ptr
>    kernel/trace/trace.c:2430:9: sparse:     got unsigned int [noderef] 
> __percpu *
> >> kernel/trace/trace.c:2430:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 
> >> (different address spaces) @@     expected void *ptr @@     got unsigned 
> >> int [noderef] __percpu * @@  
>    kernel/trace/trace.c:2430:9: sparse:     expected void *ptr
>    kernel/trace/trace.c:2430:9: sparse:     got unsigned int [noderef] 
> __percpu *
> >> kernel/trace/trace.c:2430:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 
> >> (different address spaces) @@     expected void *ptr @@     got int 
> >> [noderef] __percpu * @@  
>    kernel/trace/trace.c:2430:9: sparse:     expected void *ptr
>    kernel/trace/trace.c:2430:9: sparse:     got int [noderef] __percpu *
> >> kernel/trace/trace.c:2430:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 
> >> (different address spaces) @@     expected void *ptr @@     got int 
> >> [noderef] __percpu * @@  
>    kernel/trace/trace.c:2430:9: sparse:     expected void *ptr
>    kernel/trace/trace.c:2430:9: sparse:     got int [noderef] __percpu *
> >> kernel/trace/trace.c:2430:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 
> >> (different address spaces) @@     expected void *ptr @@     got int 
> >> [noderef] __percpu * @@  
>    kernel/trace/trace.c:2430:9: sparse:     expected void *ptr
>    kernel/trace/trace.c:2430:9: sparse:     got int [noderef] __percpu *
> >> kernel/trace/trace.c:2430:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 
> >> (different address spaces) @@     expected void *ptr @@     got int 
> >> [noderef] __percpu * @@  


> 
> vim +2430 kernel/trace/trace.c
> 
>   2410        
>   2411        static int trace_save_cmdline(struct task_struct *tsk)
>   2412        {
>   2413                unsigned tpid, idx;
>   2414        
>   2415                /* treat recording of idle task as a success */
>   2416                if (!tsk->pid)
>   2417                        return 1;
>   2418        
>   2419                tpid = tsk->pid & (PID_MAX_DEFAULT - 1);
>   2420        
>   2421                /*
>   2422                 * It's not the end of the world if we don't get
>   2423                 * the lock, but we also don't want to spin
>   2424                 * nor do we want to disable interrupts,
>   2425                 * so if we miss here, then better luck next time.
>   2426                 *
>   2427                 * This is called within the scheduler and wake up, so 
> interrupts
>   2428                 * had better been disabled and run queue lock been 
> held.
>   2429                 */
> > 2430                lockdep_assert_preemption_disabled();  

The above is a generic lockdep utility. Sounds to me that this is a bug in
the loongarch code that doesn't handle this properly.

-- Steve


>   2431                if (!arch_spin_trylock(&trace_cmdline_lock))
>   2432                        return 0;
>   2433        
>   2434                idx = savedcmd->map_pid_to_cmdline[tpid];
>   2435                if (idx == NO_CMDLINE_MAP) {
>   2436                        idx = (savedcmd->cmdline_idx + 1) % 
> savedcmd->cmdline_num;
>   2437        
>   2438                        savedcmd->map_pid_to_cmdline[tpid] = idx;
>   2439                        savedcmd->cmdline_idx = idx;
>   2440                }
>   2441        
>   2442                savedcmd->map_cmdline_to_pid[idx] = tsk->pid;
>   2443                set_cmdline(idx, tsk->comm);
>   2444        
>   2445                arch_spin_unlock(&trace_cmdline_lock);
>   2446        
>   2447                return 1;
>   2448        }
>   2449        
> 

Reply via email to