Hi Laurent Pinchart, thanks for reviewing, I'll update the new patch, thanks! Xin
> -----Original Message----- > From: Laurent Pinchart <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2023 8:13 PM > To: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> > Cc: Xin Ji <[email protected]>; Andrzej Hajda <[email protected]>; > Neil Armstrong <[email protected]>; Robert Foss <[email protected]>; > Jonas Karlman <[email protected]>; Jernej Skrabec <[email protected]>; > David Airlie <[email protected]>; Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>; Qilin Wen > <[email protected]>; [email protected]; dri- > [email protected]; [email protected]; Bernie Liang > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: Add 200ms delay to wait FW HPD status stable > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Please do not > click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender, and know the > content is safe. > > > The subject line is missing the driver name. > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 03:09:10PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > > On Thu, 21 Sep 2023, Xin Ji <[email protected]> wrote: > > > For the none-interrupt design(sink device is panel, polling HPD > > s/none-interrupt/no-interrupt/ ? OK > > s/design/design / OK > > > > status when chip power on), anx7625 FW has more than 200ms HPD > > > de-bounce time in FW, for the safety to get HPD status, driver > > > better to wait 200ms before HPD detection after OS resume back. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Xin Ji <[email protected]> > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/anx7625.c | 3 +++ > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/anx7625.c > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/anx7625.c > > > index 51abe42c639e..833d6d50a03d 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/anx7625.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/anx7625.c > > > @@ -1464,6 +1464,9 @@ static int _anx7625_hpd_polling(struct > anx7625_data *ctx, > > > if (ctx->pdata.intp_irq) > > > return 0; > > > > > > + /* Delay 200ms for FW HPD de-bounce */ > > > + usleep_range(200000, 201000); > > > > If you need to sleep for 200 ms, maybe use msleep instead? > > fsleep() could be a nice replacement. OK > > > > + > > > ret = readx_poll_timeout(anx7625_read_hpd_status_p0, > > > ctx, val, > > > ((val & HPD_STATUS) || (val < 0)), > > -- > Regards, > > Laurent Pinchart
