Hi Jingfeng,

Am Mittwoch, dem 19.07.2023 um 00:16 +0800 schrieb suijingfeng:
> Hi,
> > > 
[...]
> > > I don't think you are right here.
> > > 
> > Yes, clearly I was not taking into account the differences between
> > drm_gem_private_object_init and drm_gem_object_init properly. Please
> > disregard my comment, this patch is good as-is.
> 
> I have study your patch in the past frequently.
> 
> As you could solve very complex(and difficulty) bugs.
> 
> So I still believe that you know everything about etnaviv.
> 
While flattering, even I myself am not thinking I know everything about
etnaviv. The different HW generations and the complex subsystem the
driver is living in doesn't make it easy for anyone to keep in mind
everything.

> I'm just wondering that you are designing the traps. But I'm not sure.
> 
Certainly not. I'm just human and do make mistakes as everyone. During
the quick scrolling though the code when reviewing this patch my mind
clearly just dropped the _private_ part of one of the function names. I
appreciate being told when I am wrong and I do believe that the
exchange during the review is helpful for everyone to get on the same
page.

Regards,
Lucas

> Okay, still acceptable.
> 
> Because communicate will you is interesting.
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> > Regards,
> > Lucas
> > 
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Lucas
> > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Sui Jingfeng <[email protected]>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >    drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_gem.c | 7 +++----
> > > > >    1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_gem.c 
> > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_gem.c
> > > > > index b5f73502e3dd..be2f459c66b5 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_gem.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_gem.c
> > > > > @@ -542,7 +542,7 @@ static const struct drm_gem_object_funcs 
> > > > > etnaviv_gem_object_funcs = {
> > > > >       .vm_ops = &vm_ops,
> > > > >    };
> > > > >    
> > > > > -static int etnaviv_gem_new_impl(struct drm_device *dev, u32 size, 
> > > > > u32 flags,
> > > > > +static int etnaviv_gem_new_impl(struct drm_device *dev, u32 flags,
> > > > >       const struct etnaviv_gem_ops *ops, struct drm_gem_object **obj)
> > > > >    {
> > > > >       struct etnaviv_gem_object *etnaviv_obj;
> > > > > @@ -591,8 +591,7 @@ int etnaviv_gem_new_handle(struct drm_device 
> > > > > *dev, struct drm_file *file,
> > > > >    
> > > > >       size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
> > > > >    
> > > > > -     ret = etnaviv_gem_new_impl(dev, size, flags,
> > > > > -                                &etnaviv_gem_shmem_ops, &obj);
> > > > > +     ret = etnaviv_gem_new_impl(dev, flags, &etnaviv_gem_shmem_ops, 
> > > > > &obj);
> > > > >       if (ret)
> > > > >               goto fail;
> > > > >    
> > > > > @@ -627,7 +626,7 @@ int etnaviv_gem_new_private(struct drm_device 
> > > > > *dev, size_t size, u32 flags,
> > > > >       struct drm_gem_object *obj;
> > > > >       int ret;
> > > > >    
> > > > > -     ret = etnaviv_gem_new_impl(dev, size, flags, ops, &obj);
> > > > > +     ret = etnaviv_gem_new_impl(dev, flags, ops, &obj);
> > > > >       if (ret)
> > > > >               return ret;
> > > > >    
> 

Reply via email to