[Public]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2023 12:00 PM
> To: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]>; Sui Jingfeng
> <[email protected]>
> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]>; [email protected];
> Cornelia Huck <[email protected]>; Karol Herbst <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]; Joonas Lahtinen
> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Chai,
> Thomas <[email protected]>; Limonciello, Mario
> <[email protected]>; Gao, Likun <[email protected]>; David
> Airlie <[email protected]>; Ville Syrjala <[email protected]>; Yi 
> Liu
> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected];
> Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]>; Ben Skeggs <[email protected]>; linux-
> [email protected]; Kevin Tian <[email protected]>; Lazar, Lijo
> <[email protected]>; Thomas Zimmermann <[email protected]>;
> Zhang, Bokun <[email protected]>; [email protected];
> Maarten Lankhorst <[email protected]>; Jani Nikula
> <[email protected]>; Alex Williamson
> <[email protected]>; Abhishek Sahu <[email protected]>;
> Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>; Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]>;
> Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>; Yishai Hadas
> <[email protected]>; Pan, Xinhui <[email protected]>; linux-
> [email protected]; Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>; Deucher, Alexander
> <[email protected]>; Koenig, Christian
> <[email protected]>; Zhang, Hawking <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 6/8] PCI/VGA: Introduce is_boot_device function
> callback to vga_client_register
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2023/6/29 23:54, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 01:08:15PM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>
> >> A nouveau developer(Lyude) from redhat send me a R-B,
> >>
> >> Thanks for the developers of nouveau project.
> >>
> >>
> >> Please allow me add a link[1] here.
> >>
> >>
> >> [1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/0afadc69f99a36bc9d03ecf54ff25859dbc10e28.ca
> [email protected]/
> > 1) Thanks for this.  If you post another version of this series,
> >     please pick up Lyude's Reviewed-by and include it in the relevant
> >     patches (as long as you haven't made significant changes to the
> >     code Lyude reviewed).
>
> Yes, no significant changes. Just fix typo.
>
> I also would like to add support for other DRM drivers.
>
> But I think this deserve another patch.
>
> >   Whoever applies this should automatically
> >     pick up Reviewed-by/Ack/etc that are replies to the version being
> >     applied, but they won't go through previous revisions to find them.
> >
> > 2) Please mention the commit to which the series applies.  I tried to
> >     apply this on v6.4-rc1, but it doesn't apply cleanly.
>
> Since I'm a graphic driver developer, I'm using drm-tip.
>
> I just have already pulled, it still apply cleanly on drm-tip.
>
> > 3) Thanks for including cover letters in your postings.  Please
> >     include a little changelog in the cover letter so we know what
> >     changed between v6 and v7, etc.
>
> No change between v6 and v7,
>
> it seems that it is because the mailbox don't allow me to sending too
> many mails a day.
>
> so some of the patch is failed to delivery because out of quota.
>
>
> > 4) Right now we're in the middle of the v6.5 merge window, so new
> >     content, e.g., this series, is too late for v6.5.  Most
> >     maintainers, including me, wait to merge new content until the
> >     merge window closes and a new -rc1 is tagged.  This merge window
> >     should close on July 9, and people will start merging content for
> >     v6.6, typically based on v6.5-rc1.
>
> I'm wondering
>
> Would you will merge all of the patches in this series (e.g. including
> the patch for drm/amdgpu(7/8) and drm/radeon(8/8)) ?
>
> Or just part of them?
>
> Emm, I don't know because my patch seems across different subsystem of
> Linux kernel.
>
> There is also a developer for AMDGPU (Mario) give me a R-B for the
> patch-0002 of this series.
>
> So, at least, PATCH-0001, PATCH-0002, PATCH-0003, PATCH-0004, PATCH-
> 0006
> are already OK(got reviewed by).
>
> Those 5 patch are already qualified to be merged, I think.

I think what you can do is pick up all the tags in your next version.  Once the
whole series has tags we can discuss how it merges.

>
> I means that if you could merge those 5 patch first, then there no need
> to send another version again.
>
> I will refine the rest patch with more details and description.
>
> I'm fear of making too much noise.
>
> > Bjorn

Reply via email to