On 5/26/2023 16:55, [email protected] wrote:
From: Michal Wajdeczko <[email protected]>

Instead of printing message fence twice, include HXG header of the
unexpected message and its len.

Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: John Harrison <[email protected]>

---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c | 5 ++---
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
index af52ed4ffc7fb..3a71bb582089e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
@@ -994,9 +994,8 @@ static int ct_handle_response(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, 
struct ct_incoming_msg *r
                break;
        }
        if (!found) {
-               CT_ERROR(ct, "Unsolicited response (fence %u)\n", fence);
-               CT_ERROR(ct, "Could not find fence=%u, last_fence=%u\n", fence,
-                        ct->requests.last_fence);
+               CT_ERROR(ct, "Unsolicited response message: len %u, data %#x (fence 
%u, last %u)\n",
+                        len, hxg[0], fence, ct->requests.last_fence);
                list_for_each_entry(req, &ct->requests.pending, link)
                        CT_ERROR(ct, "request %u awaits response\n",
                                 req->fence);

Reply via email to