Il 24/02/23 11:08, Chen-Yu Tsai ha scritto:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 9:34 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<[email protected]> wrote:
The MediaTek MT8195 SoC has a Mali G57 MC5 (Valhall-JM) and has the
same number of power domains and requirements as MT8192 in terms of
bindings.
Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml
index 65fe139ceb83..4d9ab4702582 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml
@@ -25,6 +25,11 @@ properties:
- rockchip,px30-mali
- rockchip,rk3568-mali
- const: arm,mali-bifrost # Mali Bifrost GPU model/revision is
fully discoverable
+ - items:
+ - enum:
+ - mediatek,mt8195-mali
This could be squashed into "- const: mediatek,mt8195-mali" like the
following lines?
Could be, but I expect more compatibles on this list, that's why I've modeled
that as enum. I prefer keeping this an enum.
Otherwise,
Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <[email protected]>
+ - const: mediatek,mt8192-mali
+ - const: arm,mali-valhall-jm # Mali Valhall GPU model/revision is
fully discoverable
- items:
- enum:
- mediatek,mt8192-mali
--
2.39.2
