On 6/17/2022 4:33 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
The array of CRTC in the struct msm_drm_private duplicates a list of
CRTCs in the drm_device. Drop it and use the existing list for CRTC
enumeration.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/mdp4/mdp4_kms.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/mdp5/mdp5_kms.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c | 44 +++++++++++++-----------
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h | 3 +-
5 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
index e23e2552e802..e79f0a8817ac 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
@@ -806,7 +806,7 @@ static int _dpu_kms_drm_obj_init(struct dpu_kms *dpu_kms)
ret = PTR_ERR(crtc);
return ret;
}
- priv->crtcs[priv->num_crtcs++] = crtc;
+ priv->num_crtcs++;
}
/* All CRTCs are compatible with all encoders */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/mdp4/mdp4_kms.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/mdp4/mdp4_kms.c
index fb48c8c19ec3..7449c1693e45 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/mdp4/mdp4_kms.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/mdp4/mdp4_kms.c
@@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ static int modeset_init(struct mdp4_kms *mdp4_kms)
goto fail;
}
- priv->crtcs[priv->num_crtcs++] = crtc;
+ priv->num_crtcs++;
}
/*
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/mdp5/mdp5_kms.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/mdp5/mdp5_kms.c
index 3d5621a68f85..36808990f840 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/mdp5/mdp5_kms.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/mdp5/mdp5_kms.c
@@ -497,7 +497,7 @@ static int modeset_init(struct mdp5_kms *mdp5_kms)
DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev->dev, "failed to construct crtc %d
(%d)\n", i, ret);
goto fail;
}
- priv->crtcs[priv->num_crtcs++] = crtc;
+ priv->num_crtcs++;
}
/*
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
index 1aab6bf86278..567e77dae43b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ static void msm_irq_uninstall(struct drm_device *dev)
struct msm_vblank_work {
struct work_struct work;
- int crtc_id;
+ struct drm_crtc *crtc;
bool enable;
struct msm_drm_private *priv;
};
@@ -162,15 +162,15 @@ static void vblank_ctrl_worker(struct work_struct *work)
struct msm_kms *kms = priv->kms;
Is there any chance of vbl_work->crtc becoming NULL before this gets
executed?
So do we need to protect this like
if (vbl_work->enable && vbl_work->crtc)
Because the layers below this dont seem to have NULL protection.
if (vbl_work->enable)
- kms->funcs->enable_vblank(kms, priv->crtcs[vbl_work->crtc_id]);
+ kms->funcs->enable_vblank(kms, vbl_work->crtc);
else
- kms->funcs->disable_vblank(kms,
priv->crtcs[vbl_work->crtc_id]);
+ kms->funcs->disable_vblank(kms, vbl_work->crtc);
kfree(vbl_work);
}
static int vblank_ctrl_queue_work(struct msm_drm_private *priv,
- int crtc_id, bool enable)
+ struct drm_crtc *crtc, bool enable)
{
struct msm_vblank_work *vbl_work;
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ static int vblank_ctrl_queue_work(struct msm_drm_private *priv,
INIT_WORK(&vbl_work->work, vblank_ctrl_worker);
- vbl_work->crtc_id = crtc_id;
+ vbl_work->crtc = crtc;
vbl_work->enable = enable;
vbl_work->priv = priv;
@@ -354,7 +354,8 @@ static int msm_drm_init(struct device *dev, const struct drm_driver *drv)
struct msm_drm_private *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
struct drm_device *ddev;
struct msm_kms *kms;
- int ret, i;
+ struct drm_crtc *crtc;
+ int ret;
if (drm_firmware_drivers_only())
return -ENODEV;
@@ -427,20 +428,23 @@ static int msm_drm_init(struct device *dev, const struct
drm_driver *drv)
ddev->mode_config.funcs = &mode_config_funcs;
ddev->mode_config.helper_private = &mode_config_helper_funcs;
- for (i = 0; i < priv->num_crtcs; i++) {
+ drm_for_each_crtc(crtc, ddev) {
+ struct msm_drm_thread *ev_thread;
+
/* initialize event thread */
- priv->event_thread[i].crtc_id = priv->crtcs[i]->base.id;
- priv->event_thread[i].dev = ddev;
- priv->event_thread[i].worker = kthread_create_worker(0,
- "crtc_event:%d", priv->event_thread[i].crtc_id);
- if (IS_ERR(priv->event_thread[i].worker)) {
- ret = PTR_ERR(priv->event_thread[i].worker);
+ ev_thread = &priv->event_thread[drm_crtc_index(crtc)];
+ ev_thread->crtc = crtc;
+ ev_thread->dev = ddev;
+ ev_thread->worker = kthread_create_worker(0,
+ "crtc_event:%d", ev_thread->crtc->base.id);
Please correct me if wrong.
Today, other than just populating the name for the worker is the
ev_thread->crtc used anywhere?
If so, can we just drop crtc from msm_drm_thread and while creating the
worker just use kthread_create_worker(0, "crtc_event:%d", crtc->base.id);
+ if (IS_ERR(ev_thread->worker)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(ev_thread->worker);
DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev, "failed to create crtc_event
kthread\n");
- priv->event_thread[i].worker = NULL;
+ ev_thread->worker = NULL;
goto err_msm_uninit;
}
- sched_set_fifo(priv->event_thread[i].worker->task);
+ sched_set_fifo(ev_thread->worker->task);
}
ret = drm_vblank_init(ddev, priv->num_crtcs);
@@ -563,25 +567,23 @@ static void msm_postclose(struct drm_device *dev, struct
drm_file *file)
int msm_crtc_enable_vblank(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
{
struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev;
- unsigned int pipe = crtc->index;
struct msm_drm_private *priv = dev->dev_private;
struct msm_kms *kms = priv->kms;
if (!kms)
return -ENXIO;
- drm_dbg_vbl(dev, "crtc=%u", pipe);
- return vblank_ctrl_queue_work(priv, pipe, true);
+ drm_dbg_vbl(dev, "crtc=%u", crtc->base.id);
+ return vblank_ctrl_queue_work(priv, crtc, true);
}
void msm_crtc_disable_vblank(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
{
struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev;
- unsigned int pipe = crtc->index;
struct msm_drm_private *priv = dev->dev_private;
struct msm_kms *kms = priv->kms;
if (!kms)
return;
- drm_dbg_vbl(dev, "crtc=%u", pipe);
- vblank_ctrl_queue_work(priv, pipe, false);
+ drm_dbg_vbl(dev, "crtc=%u", crtc->base.id);
+ vblank_ctrl_queue_work(priv, crtc, false);
}
/*
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h
index 08388d742d65..0e98b6f161df 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ struct msm_display_topology {
/* Commit/Event thread specific structure */
struct msm_drm_thread {
struct drm_device *dev;
- unsigned int crtc_id;
+ struct drm_crtc *crtc;
struct kthread_worker *worker;
};
@@ -178,7 +178,6 @@ struct msm_drm_private {
struct workqueue_struct *wq;
unsigned int num_crtcs;
- struct drm_crtc *crtcs[MAX_CRTCS];
struct msm_drm_thread event_thread[MAX_CRTCS];
