Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2022-03-25 05:17:36)
> The msm_mdss serves several roles at this moment. It provides IRQ domain
> used by MDP5 and DPU drivers but it also serves as a component master
> for both those usecases. MDP4 (which does not have separate MDSS device)
> is the component master on it's own.
> Remove this assymmetry and make both MDP5 and DPU component masters too.
> This removes a need to care about drm/components from msm_mdss driver,
> removes an mdss pointer from struct msm_drm_private and simplifies the
> interface between mdp5/dpu and msm_drv.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <[email protected]>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>

Reply via email to