On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 3:47 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> wrote: > > In order to better track where in the kernel the dma-buf code is used, > put the symbols in the namespace DMA_BUF and modify all users of the > symbols to properly import the namespace to not break the build at the > same time. > > Now the output of modinfo shows the use of these symbols, making it > easier to watch for users over time: > > $ modinfo drivers/misc/fastrpc.ko | grep import > import_ns: DMA_BUF > > Cc: Sumit Semwal <[email protected]> > Cc: "Christian König" <[email protected]> > Cc: Alex Deucher <[email protected]> > Cc: "Pan, Xinhui" <[email protected]> > Cc: David Airlie <[email protected]> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <[email protected]> > Cc: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]> > Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <[email protected]> > Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]> > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> > The topic of dma-buf came up in the Maintainer's summit yesterday, and > one comment was to put the symbols in their own module namespace, to > make it easier to notice and track who was using them. This patch does > so, and finds some "interesting" users of the api already in the tree. > > Only test-built on x86 allmodconfig, don't know what other arches will > pick up, will let 0-day run on it for a bit... I've added it to my build box doing arm32/arm64/x86 randconfig tests, if it doesn't report anything by Monday, it's probably good in that regard. Arnd
