From: Luben Tuikov <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit dce4400e6516d18313d23de45b5be8a18980b00e ]

No need to account for the 2 bytes of EEPROM
address--this is now well abstracted away by
the fixes the the lower layers.

Cc: Andrey Grodzovsky <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Deucher <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Luben Tuikov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Alexander Deucher <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c
index 38222de921d1..8dd151c9e459 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c
@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ int amdgpu_ras_eeprom_init(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control 
*control,
                return ret;
        }
 
-       __decode_table_header_from_buff(hdr, &buff[2]);
+       __decode_table_header_from_buff(hdr, buff);
 
        if (hdr->header == EEPROM_TABLE_HDR_VAL) {
                control->num_recs = (hdr->tbl_size - EEPROM_TABLE_HEADER_SIZE) /
-- 
2.30.2

Reply via email to