On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 10:59:22AM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> > drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/ispstat.c | 5 +--
> > include/uapi/linux/omap3isp.h | 44 +++++++++++++++++------
> > 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/ispstat.c
> > b/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/ispstat.c
> > index 5b9b57f4d9bf..ea8222fed38e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/ispstat.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/ispstat.c
> > @@ -512,7 +512,7 @@ int omap3isp_stat_request_statistics(struct ispstat
> > *stat,
> > int omap3isp_stat_request_statistics_time32(struct ispstat *stat,
> > struct omap3isp_stat_data_time32 *data)
> > {
> > - struct omap3isp_stat_data data64;
> > + struct omap3isp_stat_data data64 = { };
>
> Should this be { 0 } ?
>
> We've seen patches trying to switch from { 0 } to { } but the answer
> was that { 0 } is supposed to be used,
> http://www.ex-parrot.com/~chris/random/initialise.html
>
> (from
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/)
In the kernel we don't care about portability so much. Use the = { }
GCC extension. If the first member of the struct is a pointer then
Sparse will complain about = { 0 }.
I had a patch to make checkpatch.pl complain about = { 0 }; but my
system died and I haven't transfered my postponed messages to the new
system...
regards,
dan carpenter
