29.03.2021 16:38, Mikko Perttunen пишет:
> Make syncpoint expiration checks always use the same logic used by
> the hardware. This ensures that there are no race conditions that
> could occur because of the hardware triggering a syncpoint interrupt
> and then the driver disagreeing.
> 
> One situation where this could occur is if a job incremented a
> syncpoint too many times -- then the hardware would trigger an
> interrupt, but the driver would assume that a syncpoint value
> greater than the syncpoint's max value is in the future, and not
> clean up the job.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mikko Perttunen <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/host1x/syncpt.c | 51 ++-----------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/host1x/syncpt.c b/drivers/gpu/host1x/syncpt.c
> index f061dfd5bbc7..8da4bbce8b9d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/host1x/syncpt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/host1x/syncpt.c
> @@ -321,59 +321,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(host1x_syncpt_wait);
>  bool host1x_syncpt_is_expired(struct host1x_syncpt *sp, u32 thresh)
>  {
>       u32 current_val;
> -     u32 future_val;
>  
>       smp_rmb();
>  
>       current_val = (u32)atomic_read(&sp->min_val);
> -     future_val = (u32)atomic_read(&sp->max_val);
> -
> -     /* Note the use of unsigned arithmetic here (mod 1<<32).
> -      *
> -      * c = current_val = min_val    = the current value of the syncpoint.
> -      * t = thresh                   = the value we are checking
> -      * f = future_val  = max_val    = the value c will reach when all
> -      *                                outstanding increments have completed.
> -      *
> -      * Note that c always chases f until it reaches f.
> -      *
> -      * Dtf = (f - t)
> -      * Dtc = (c - t)
> -      *
> -      *  Consider all cases:
> -      *
> -      *      A) .....c..t..f.....    Dtf < Dtc       need to wait
> -      *      B) .....c.....f..t..    Dtf > Dtc       expired
> -      *      C) ..t..c.....f.....    Dtf > Dtc       expired    (Dct very 
> large)
> -      *
> -      *  Any case where f==c: always expired (for any t).    Dtf == Dcf
> -      *  Any case where t==c: always expired (for any f).    Dtf >= Dtc 
> (because Dtc==0)
> -      *  Any case where t==f!=c: always wait.                Dtf <  Dtc 
> (because Dtf==0,
> -      *                                                      Dtc!=0)
> -      *
> -      *  Other cases:
> -      *
> -      *      A) .....t..f..c.....    Dtf < Dtc       need to wait
> -      *      A) .....f..c..t.....    Dtf < Dtc       need to wait
> -      *      A) .....f..t..c.....    Dtf > Dtc       expired
> -      *
> -      *   So:
> -      *         Dtf >= Dtc implies EXPIRED   (return true)
> -      *         Dtf <  Dtc implies WAIT      (return false)
> -      *
> -      * Note: If t is expired then we *cannot* wait on it. We would wait
> -      * forever (hang the system).
> -      *
> -      * Note: do NOT get clever and remove the -thresh from both sides. It
> -      * is NOT the same.
> -      *
> -      * If future valueis zero, we have a client managed sync point. In that
> -      * case we do a direct comparison.
> -      */
> -     if (!host1x_syncpt_client_managed(sp))
> -             return future_val - thresh >= current_val - thresh;
> -     else
> -             return (s32)(current_val - thresh) >= 0;
> +
> +     return ((current_val - thresh) & 0x80000000U) == 0U;
>  }
>  
>  int host1x_syncpt_init(struct host1x *host)
> 

Tested-by: Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to