On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 04:41:59PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]> > > /home/rdunlap/lnx/lnx-59-rc2/Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst:182: > WARNING: Title underline too short. > Indefinite DMA Fences > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > Fixes: 72b6ede73623 ("dma-buf.rst: Document why indefinite fences are a bad > idea") > Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> > Cc: Dave Airlie <[email protected]>
Applied to drm-misc-fixes, thanks for your patch. -Daniel > --- > Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > --- lnx-59-rc2.orig/Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst > +++ lnx-59-rc2/Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst > @@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ DMA Fence uABI/Sync File > :internal: > > Indefinite DMA Fences > -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > At various times &dma_fence with an indefinite time until dma_fence_wait() > finishes have been proposed. Examples include: > -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
