On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 07:00:12AM -0600, Adam Ford wrote: > On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 2:36 PM Ville Syrjala > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > From: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> > > > > The currently listed dotclock disagrees with the currently > > listed vrefresh rate. Change the dotclock to match the vrefresh. > > > > Someone tell me which (if either) of the dotclock or vreresh is > > correct? > > > > Cc: Adam Ford <[email protected]> > > Cc: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c > > index 225be4757a85..3a46b82722f5 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c > > @@ -2277,7 +2277,7 @@ static const struct drm_display_mode > > mitsubishi_aa070mc01_mode = { > > }; > > > > static const struct drm_display_mode logicpd_type_28_mode = { > > - .clock = 9000, > > + .clock = 9107, > > This should be OK. The max dotclk frequency of this panel is 12MHz, > so 9.107MHz should be just fine. > > Reviewed-by: Adam Ford <[email protected]>
Thanks. Pushed to drm-misc-next. -- Ville Syrjälä Intel _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
