The clock framework DT provider helpers don't check the pointers in the
array registered by the clock provider before returning it.

This means that if the array is sparse, we will end up returning a NULL
pointer while the caller expects an error pointer, resulting in a crash.

Let's test the pointer returned and properly return an error if the pointer
is NULL.

Cc: Michael Turquette <[email protected]>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/clk/clk.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index f0f2b599fd7e..8532b5ed1060 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -4318,13 +4318,18 @@ struct clk *of_clk_src_onecell_get(struct 
of_phandle_args *clkspec, void *data)
 {
        struct clk_onecell_data *clk_data = data;
        unsigned int idx = clkspec->args[0];
+       struct clk *clk;
 
        if (idx >= clk_data->clk_num) {
                pr_err("%s: invalid clock index %u\n", __func__, idx);
                return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
        }
 
-       return clk_data->clks[idx];
+       clk = clk_data->clks[idx];
+       if (!clk)
+               return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
+
+       return clk;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_clk_src_onecell_get);
 
@@ -4333,13 +4338,18 @@ of_clk_hw_onecell_get(struct of_phandle_args *clkspec, 
void *data)
 {
        struct clk_hw_onecell_data *hw_data = data;
        unsigned int idx = clkspec->args[0];
+       struct clk_hw *hw;
 
        if (idx >= hw_data->num) {
                pr_err("%s: invalid index %u\n", __func__, idx);
                return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
        }
 
-       return hw_data->hws[idx];
+       hw = hw_data->hws[idx];
+       if (!hw)
+               return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
+
+       return hw;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_clk_hw_onecell_get);
 
-- 
git-series 0.9.1
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to