On 2020-01-06 10:24, [email protected] wrote: > On 02.01.2020 11:08, Sam Ravnborg wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 02:28:28PM +0200, Claudiu Beznea wrote: >>> From: Peter Rosin <[email protected]> >>> >>> The intention was to only select a higher pixel-clock rate than the >>> requested, if a slight overclocking would result in a rate significantly >>> closer to the requested rate than if the conservative lower pixel-clock >>> rate is selected. The fixed patch has the logic the other way around and >>> actually prefers the higher frequency. Fix that. >>> >>> Fixes: f6f7ad323461 ("drm/atmel-hlcdc: allow selecting a higher pixel-clock >>> than requested") >> The id is wrong here - the right one is: >> 9946a3a9dbedaaacef8b7e94f6ac144f1daaf1de > > Right! Sorry for this one! Thank you for fixing it up.
Dito. This one was my fault. I wonder how I came up with the wrong id? Probably some backport branch or something, but I'm not finding it. Oh well, sorry again. Cheers, Peter _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
