On Fri, 22 Nov 2019, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Maintainers, > > Can you please express your opinion on these patches: > > [tegra] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/327099/?series=65831&rev=1 > [vc4] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/327102/?series=65831&rev=1 > [zte] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/327106/?series=65831&rev=1 > [zte] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/327112/?series=65831&rev=1 > [i915] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/327120/?series=65831&rev=1
I've expressed my opinion in [1] and that hasn't changed. I don't like the interface, and a few years down the line I expect there's going to be a patch series renaming drm_connector_init_with_ddc() back to drm_connector_init() with an extra parameter, and NULL will be passed where ddc is not relevant. Anyway, that ship has sailed, you didn't even care to reply, and nobody else seems to mind, so meh, and ack on the patch. Indeed I would've applied it already, but it no longer applies, so please send the rebased i915 patch individually to [email protected] so we'll also get CI coverage against the current drm-tip tree. BR, Jani. [1] http://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] > > ? > > Of the originally posted patches: > > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/62764/ > > only the above are still outstanding, the others have been applied > to at least drm-misc-next or are already upstream. > > Regards, > > Andrzej -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
