On 2019-10-23 1:21 pm, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
When deferring the probe because of a missing regulator, we were calling
pm_runtime_disable even if pm_runtime_enable wasn't called.
Move the call to pm_runtime_disable to the right place.
Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <[email protected]>
Cc: Robin Murphy <[email protected]>
Fixes: f4a3c6a44b35 ("drm/panfrost: Disable PM on probe failure")
I think that commit was right at the time, but actually we missed
reordering the cleanup path to match the change in 635430797d3f.
Otherwise, though,
Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c
index bc2ddeb55f5d..f21bc8a7ee3a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c
@@ -556,11 +556,11 @@ static int panfrost_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return 0;
err_out2:
+ pm_runtime_disable(pfdev->dev);
panfrost_devfreq_fini(pfdev);
err_out1:
panfrost_device_fini(pfdev);
err_out0:
- pm_runtime_disable(pfdev->dev);
drm_dev_put(ddev);
return err;
}
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
