Dave Airlie <[email protected]> writes:

> On 6 February 2018 at 06:32, Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 08:14:48AM +0000, Keith Packard wrote:
>>> Dhinakaran Pandiyan <[email protected]> writes:
>>>
>>> > From: "Pandiyan, Dhinakaran" <[email protected]>
>>> >
>>> > drm_vblank_count() has an u32 type returning what is a 64-bit vblank 
>>> > count.
>>> > The effect of this is when drm_wait_vblank_ioctl() tries to widen the user
>>> > space requested vblank sequence using this clipped 32-bit count(when the
>>> > value is >= 2^32) as reference, the requested sequence remains a 32-bit
>>> > value and gets queued like that. However, the code that checks if the
>>> > requested sequence has passed compares this against the 64-bit vblank
>>> > count.
>>>
>>> For patches 1-7:
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Keith Packard <[email protected]>
>>
>> Dave, ack to merge them through drm-intel-next-queued ?
>
> Ack. do we know if any of those need to be in -fixes?

All patches merged to drm-intel-next-queued.
Thanks for the patches, reviews and acks.

>
> or too early to tell?
>
> Dave.
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to