-----Original Message-----
From: dri-devel [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Thomas Hellstrom
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2017 3:51 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] drm/ttm: add ttm_bo_evict_swapout_allowable to check 
bo is allowable to evict or swapout

On 12/20/2017 11:35 AM, Roger He wrote:
> extract this function since eviction and swapout share same logic

        But it's only used in eviction?

Yes, currently it only used in eviction. And will be used in Swapout.

>
> Change-Id: I80a475a93fceed8d66d74a1832c815a0756341ac
> Signed-off-by: Roger He <[email protected]>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++----------
>   1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c index e7595b4..313925c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> @@ -706,6 +706,23 @@ bool ttm_bo_eviction_valuable(struct ttm_buffer_object 
> *bo,
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(ttm_bo_eviction_valuable);
>   
> +static bool ttm_bo_evict_swapout_allowable(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
> +                     struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx, bool *locked)

        Could we have a description in the code what this function actually 
does? admittedly it checks whether a swapout or eviction is         allowable, 
but it aso performs a recursive tryreserve(), and that is of value to any 
future code reader.?

Ok.

Thanks
Roger(Hongbo.He)

/Thomas


> +{
> +     bool ret = false;
> +
> +     *locked = false;
> +     if (bo->resv == ctx->resv) {
> +             if (ctx->allow_reserved_eviction || !list_empty(&bo->ddestroy))
> +                     ret = true;
> +     } else {
> +             *locked = reservation_object_trylock(bo->resv);
> +             ret = *locked;
> +     }
> +
> +     return ret;
> +}
> +
>   static int ttm_mem_evict_first(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev,
>                              uint32_t mem_type,
>                              const struct ttm_place *place, @@ -721,21 
> +738,13 @@ 
> static int ttm_mem_evict_first(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev,
>       spin_lock(&glob->lru_lock);
>       for (i = 0; i < TTM_MAX_BO_PRIORITY; ++i) {
>               list_for_each_entry(bo, &man->lru[i], lru) {
> -                     if (bo->resv == ctx->resv) {
> -                             if (!ctx->allow_reserved_eviction &&
> -                                 list_empty(&bo->ddestroy))
> -                                     continue;
> -                     } else {
> -                             locked = reservation_object_trylock(bo->resv);
> -                             if (!locked)
> -                                     continue;
> -                     }
> +                     if (!ttm_bo_evict_swapout_allowable(bo, ctx, &locked))
> +                             continue;
>   
>                       if (place && !bdev->driver->eviction_valuable(bo,
>                                                                     place)) {
>                               if (locked)
>                                       reservation_object_unlock(bo->resv);
> -                             locked = false;
>                               continue;
>                       }
>                       break;


_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to