Archit Taneja <[email protected]> writes: > On 07/15/2017 04:28 AM, Eric Anholt wrote: >> Archit Taneja <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> On 06/28/2017 01:28 AM, Eric Anholt wrote: >>>> When a mipi_dsi_host is registered, the DT is walked to find any child >>>> nodes with compatible strings. Those get registered as DSI devices, >>>> and most DSI panel drivers are mipi_dsi_drivers that attach to those nodes. >>>> >>>> There is one special case currently, the adv7533 bridge, where the >>>> bridge probes on I2C, and during the bridge attach step it looks up >>>> the mipi_dsi_host and registers the mipi_dsi_device (for its own stub >>>> mipi_dsi_driver). >>>> >>>> For the Raspberry Pi panel, though, we also need to attach on I2C (our >>>> control bus), but don't have a bridge driver. The lack of a bridge's >>>> attach() step like adv7533 uses means that we aren't able to delay the >>>> mipi_dsi_device creation until the mipi_dsi_host is present. >>>> >>>> To fix this, we extend mipi_dsi_device_register_full() to allow being >>>> called with a NULL host, which puts the device on a queue waiting for >>>> a host to appear. When a new host is registered, we fill in the host >>>> value and finish the device creation process. >>> >>> This is quite a nice idea. The only bothering thing is the info.of_node >>> usage >>> varies between child nodes (mipi_dsi_devs) and non-child nodes (i2c control >>> bus). >>> >>> For DSI children expressed in DT, the of_node in info holds the DT node >>> corresponding to the DSI child itself. For non-DT ones, this patch assumes >>> that info.of_node stores the DSI host DT node. I think it should be okay as >>> long as we mention the usage in a comment somewhere. The other option is to >>> have a new info.host_node field to keep a track of the host DT node. >> >> I think maybe you misread the patch? We're using >> of_get_parent(dsi->dev.node), which came from info->node, to compare to >> host->dev->of_node(). > > I think I did misread it. > > Although, I'm not entirely clear what we should be setting info.node to. > In patch #8, info.node is set by: > > endpoint = of_graph_get_next_endpoint(dev->of_node, NULL); > info.node = of_graph_get_remote_port(endpoint); > > Looking at the dt bindings in patch #7, it looks like info.node is set > to the 'port' device node in dsi@7e700000, is that right?
Yeah.
> I suppose 'port' here seems like a reasonable representation of
> dsi->dev.node, I wonder how it would work if the dsi host had multiple
> ports underneath it. I.e:
>
> dsi@7e700000 {
> ...
> ...
> ports {
> port@0 {
> ...
> dsi_out_port: endpoint {
> remote-endpoint = <&panel_dsi_port>;
> };
> };
> port@1 {
> ...
> ...
> };
> };
> };
>
> Here, we would need to set info.node to the 'ports' node, so that
> of_get_parent(dsi->dev.of_node) equals host->dev->of_node. That doesn't
> seem correct.
>
> Ideally, a dev's 'of_node' should be left to NULL if we don't have a
> corresponding OF node. We're sort of overriding it here since we don't
> have any other place to store this information in the mipi_dsi_device
> struct.
>
> Maybe we could add a 'host_node' entry in mipi_dsi_device itself, which
> is exclusively used cases where the DSI device doesn't have a DT node.
> Our check in mipi_dsi_host_register() could then be something like:
I think instead of extending the struct, we can just walk to the parent
similarly to how of_graph_get_remove_port_parent() does. And fix some
node refcounting at the same time:
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c
index ed3d505dc203..77d439254da6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c
@@ -313,7 +313,12 @@ int mipi_dsi_host_register(struct mipi_dsi_host *host)
* connect our host to it and probe them now.
*/
list_for_each_entry_safe(dsi, temp, &unattached_device_list, list) {
- if (of_get_parent(dsi->dev.of_node) == host->dev->of_node) {
+ struct device_node *host_node = of_get_parent(dsi->dev.of_node);
+
+ if (!of_node_cmp(host_node->name, "ports"))
+ host_node = of_get_next_parent(host_node);
+
+ if (host_node == host->dev->of_node) {
dsi->host = host;
dsi->dev.parent = host->dev;
device_initialize(&dsi->dev);
@@ -321,6 +326,8 @@ int mipi_dsi_host_register(struct mipi_dsi_host *host)
mipi_dsi_device_add(dsi);
list_del_init(&dsi->list);
}
+
+ of_node_put(host_node);
}
mutex_unlock(&host_lock);
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
