On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 09:38:15AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > I think the initial experiment worked fairly well, and the > kickstarting of a review (well, ack/best practices really) market > seems to work ok-ish too. I think we can try to make it (slowly) scale > to more drivers, with driver teams interested in being part of > drm-misc. I do think we need to be careful though, to make sure we > don't overstretch the review/mentoring bandwidth and can improve > process&tooling as we go. > > Cc: Sumit Semwal <[email protected]> > Cc: Gustavo Padovan <[email protected]> > Cc: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> > Cc: Sean Paul <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Sean Paul <[email protected]> > Cc: Archit Taneja <[email protected]> > Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <[email protected]> > Cc: Boris Brezillon <[email protected]> > Cc: Neil Armstrong <[email protected]> > Cc: Mark Yao <[email protected]> > Cc: Eric Anholt <[email protected]> > Cc: Shawn Guo <[email protected]> > Cc: Dave Airlie <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> > --- > drm-misc.rst | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drm-misc.rst b/drm-misc.rst > index b6d01f2c7c2b..e4409cce8178 100644 > --- a/drm-misc.rst > +++ b/drm-misc.rst > @@ -105,8 +105,8 @@ Small Drivers > ============= > > Small drivers, where a full tree is overkill, can be maintained in drm-misc. > For > -now it's just an experiment with a few drivers to figure out a working > process. > -Slightly different rules apply: > +now there's just a few drivers maintained in drm-misc, but we can slowly add > +more to figure out how to make this scale. Slightly different rules apply: > > * Small is measured in patches merged per kernel release. The occasional big > patch series is still acceptable if it's not a common thing (e.g. new hw > -- > 2.11.0 -- Sean Paul, Software Engineer, Google / Chromium OS _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
