op 19-02-14 14:56, Thomas Hellstrom schreef:
>> >+static void fence_check_cb_func(struct fence *f, struct fence_cb *cb)
>> >+{
>> >+ struct sync_fence_cb *check = container_of(cb, struct sync_fence_cb,
>> >cb);
>> >+ struct sync_fence *fence = check->fence;
>> >+
>> >+ // TODO: Add a fence->status member and check it
> Hmm, C++ / C99 style comments makes checkpatch.pl complain. Did you run
> this series through checkpatch?
>
> /Thomas
>
Actually I used c99 here because it shouldn't have been in the sent patch. ;-)
Right below that comment I use fence->status, so the right thing to do was to
zap the comment.
Thanks for catching it!
~Maarten\
