Doesn't matter to me whether your proposed change is done or not. I certainly have no objection, but I won't have time to work on it myself.
I am concerned about the amount of work involved to change all the existing documents. I'm sure some could be automated by our macro gurus, but checking for what breaks is always a manual job -- especially since some of the files still have very old style definitions lurking in them. However, if program changes wrt styles in LO 3.5 require us to fix our lists or other styles, then doing the whole job at the same time makes much sense. And when revising docs to cover feature changes, we have to check all the files anyway... so perhaps the extra work won't be as great as I think. So if you are volunteering to do the styles adaptation, or an important part of it, that's okay with me. --Jean On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 03:01, Jean-Francois Nifenecker <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > apart from Gary, this topic doesn't seem to attract masses... Jean? The > Authors? > > To all: I am willing to participate to any effort into a styles adaptation > within the guides documents according to my first message suggestions. > Though, this effort is not worth right now, because of the new features that > should be introduced into LibO v.3.5 wrt styles. When this version is out, > I'm ok for some work into that matter. > > Thanks for your attention, > > -- > Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux > -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
