Hi,

Am 08.06.22 um 16:41 schrieb F Campos Costero:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 5:22 PM Keith N. McKenna <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Dennis Hamilton wrote:
>>> Here's my recommendation.
>>>
>>>   1.  Do not wait for 4.2.  Use the available energy  and volunteer
>> power to advance the Guides for 4.1.
>>>   2. Do not ever tie yourself to a speculative schedule not under your
>> control.  Not ever.
>>> 3. When 4.2 ships or is ready for/in beta, ship a supplement.  There are
>> not supposed to be breaking changes.  Probably will though.  Just make a
>> quick supplement that can be used in the interim before new 4.2 documents
>> are available.  The supplement will also earn feedback for things that
>> people notice that are not covered or need to be covered better, and that
>> will lead to supplement updates and also improved 4.2 documents.
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>>   - Dennis
>>>
>> Thanks for your recommendation Dennis. It was an approach I hadn't
>> thought of. I am hoping that I will from the other members of the team
>> as well so that we can come to consensus on the path.
>>
>> Regards
>> Keith
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
> I agree with Dennis that we should not wait for 4.2. I doubt that the
> changes between 4.1.x and 4.2 will cause anything like the number of
> revisions needed to update the existing guides
Fortunately that's not fact...
>  to match the current release
> and the schedule for 4.2 cannot even be guessed. Let's just plow ahead.

But that's true. Don't wait for 4.2.0. ;-)

Regards,

   Matthias

> Regards,
> Francis
>

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to