Pierce,

I don't regret that you have selected MoinMoin. I like it myself.
However it could be more easy to extend DocBook features of MoinMoin
than to integrate MoinMoin and DocBookWiki.

Regards,
Dashamir

Pierce Tyler wrote:
> Hi, Fintan:
> 
> That is a very interesting idea. It would give users the best of both 
> worlds, really.
> 
> We recently finished evaluating wikis for implementation at our site. 
> And the choice came down to MoinMoin vs. DocBook Wiki. It was an 
> extremely tough choice. Both packages have strengths and weaknesses. But 
> in the end we went with MoinMoin because the community is larger and 
> more active and development is moving forward.
> 
> While MoinMoin does offer some DocBook support, that support is not 
> nearly as extensive as DocBook Wiki's. Also, the backend SVN support 
> offered by DocBook Wiki is something MoinMoin does not currently offer.
> 
> I suppose integrating a PHP-based application with MoinMoin, which is 
> written in Python, could pose some challenges. But, again, I really like 
> this idea if it were possible--or if people were interested in trying to 
> make it happen.
> 
> Best regards,
> Pierce
> 
> 
> Bolton, Fintan wrote:
>> Hello Dashamir,
>>
>> I wonder if you have ever considered re-packaging DocBook Wiki as a
>> plug-in to one of the mainstream Wikis, such as Confluence or Moin-Moin?
>>
>> It is a peculiar paradox that, although DocBook Wiki has much better
>> DocBook support than any other Wiki out there, it has failed to gain
>> much traction in the Wiki space. I suspect the reason for this is that
>> there is currently a rather high threshold to getting a new Wiki flavour
>> accepted. For example, on a typical open source project, you would have
>> very little prospect of persuading an open source community to drop
>> Moin-Moin or Confluence in favour of a little-known product like DocBook
>> Wiki. Even persuading the community to adopt it as an 'extra' Wiki would
>> probably be an uphill battle.
>>
>> In marketing terms, therefore, it would be much easier to get DocBook
>> Wiki accepted if it came in the form of a Confluence or Moin-Moin
>> plug-in. Adding plug-ins to Wikis is a routine procedure that would be
>> unlikely to arouse much controversy in an open source community.
>>
>> Of course, I am glossing over the technical difficulties here, which
>> might be considerable. But the integration would not have to be perfect.
>> The main goal would be to make DocBook Wiki look similar enough to the
>> host Wiki, so that it can gain acceptance. On a technical level,
>> probably the main priorities would be to integrate user administration
>> with the host Wiki and to change the appearance of the pages to look
>> more like the host Wiki.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Fintan
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------
>> IONA Technologies GmbH (registriert in Deutschland, AG Darmstadt)
>> Registernummer: HRB 7939
>> Geschäftsadresse: Im Leuschnerpark 4, D- 64347 Griesheim, Deutschland 
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Doc-book-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/doc-book-users
> 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Doc-book-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/doc-book-users

Reply via email to