Ben Schwartz <[email protected]> wrote: > I assume the authors considered this option and concluded that it isn't > sufficient. I'd like to know why. Then we can add the minimum > complexity needed to alleviate those concerns.
I think that they concluded that the root server operators were not, at the time, willing. Or perhaps that it was premature to expend the political effort to convince them. Maybe that's not the case anymore. I also think that it's worth expanding beyond the "13" Remember that this eliminates all of the root NS priming. No outside dependancies if the things you need to talk to are nearby. Like for an island like Tonga. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
