Mahesh Jethanandani has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-3901bis-10: Abstain
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-3901bis/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Based on the pointers provided by the authors, I am convinced that the authors did provide a detailed response to the comments raised as part of the DNSDIR review, noting that the review link in the datatracker was different from the one provided by the authors. I will also note that the chairs have called rough consensus on the points raised as part of the review. That therefore clears my comments on the technical part of the discussion. I am changing my ballot to an Abstain on the question of the type of document (a BCP) as I feel it might be beyond its remit on some of the recommendations it provides. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
