Moin, thanks for the review! Please find my responses inline.
> Nits: > > s/recrusive/recursive/ > > s/...from resolving for clients.../...from being resolved for > clients.../ These have already been addressed during an earlier review. Thanks again, though, for pointing them out. > s/If the name from an NS RR for a zone is sibling domain/If the name > from an NS > RR for a zone is (in?) sibling domain/ Thanks for spotting this; This has been addressed in the following PR: https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-3901bis/pull/62 > [...] These above statements appear somewhat contradictory. I'd tend > to think that the first recommendation describes the ideal > configuration, while the latter is a minimum requirement? It may be > helpful to clarify this explicitly in the text to avoid confusion. The above comment was already made in an earlier review. We plan to address it with the following PR: https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-3901bis/pull/61 Thank you again for your detailed review. With best regards, Tobias -- Dr.-Ing. Tobias Fiebig T +31 616 80 98 99 M [email protected] Pronouns: he/him/his _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
