"John R Levine" <[email protected]> writes: > That's the policy for country codes that don't exist any more, like > when .CS split into .CZ and .SK, or .TP turned into .TL. While I am > less certain than I used to be, I am fairly sure that .US still > exists.
You're missing my point... If the process of making the RFC historic means the registration process / holdership for the current registrants will change, or worse be suddenly pulled out from underneath them, then shouldn't they have a warning period that the entire .us structure is about to change how it's run? IE, "this is going historic in 5 years" seems safer to the current end-user registrants. -- Wes Hardaker _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
