Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> wrote: >> Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> wrote: >>> gets in a way). There has been slightly more people in favor of >>> adopting this document by the working group. >> >> Reviews archives... Other than one strange email from Joss Darl >> Martinez, I haven't seen anyone opposed. But maybe I've missed that. >> I'm interested hearing from those who object, and why.
> I think you misunderstood my comment. Sorry for not being clear.
Oh!
> I meant that this draft has received more support than
> draft-berra-dnsop-announce-scanner (which I consider to be from the
> same batch of drafts by Johan and friends).
Yes... but it's not a case of A vs B, right?
We can adopt both? They solve related, but not identical problems.
Maybe one doesn't need scanning if mgmt-via-ddns is done.
Maybe it's a case of Belt *AND* Suspenders being useful.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
