> On 13 Dec 2025, at 5:39 am, John Levine <[email protected]> wrote: > > It appears that Warren Kumari <[email protected]> said: >>> caching forwarder (forwards to) >>> -> anycast IP >>> -> load balancer level 1 >>> -> load balancer level 2 >>> -> recursive resolver >>> >>> The trouble is, each layer uses a different timeout and retry strategy ... >> Personally I'd much rather an *operational* document describing how setups >> like the above are a bad idea and are likely to come back and bite you. >> "Doctor, doctor, it hurts when I do this…." > > I'm with Warren. It seems unlikely to me that enough people would > implement yet another option any time soon, and if they're going to > make any changes, a tweak to the config timeouts seems a lot easier. > >> There is a massive amount of tribal knowledge about how to build, run and >> deploy DNS services, but we haven't really done a great job of writing that >> down. > > I couldn't agree more. Cue the endless colliding key tag debate. >
I agree entirely. It seems that its time to re-introduce the DNS Camel into this stream! Geoff _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
