I support adoption too - anything that lets operators test DNSSEC
deployment without breaking things is to be applauded.

Mike

On Thu, 11 Dec 2025 at 09:03, Libor Peltan <libor.peltan=
[email protected]> wrote:

> I support adoption of dry-run DNSSEC draft.
>
> Libor
>
> On 27. 11. 25 13:19, Peter Thomassen via Datatracker wrote:
> > Subject: Call for adoption: draft-yorgos-dnsop-dry-run-dnssec-04  (Ends
> > 2025-12-11)
> >
> > This message starts a 2-week Call for Adoption for this document.
> >
> > Abstract:
> >     This document describes a method called "dry-run DNSSEC" that allows
> >     for testing DNSSEC deployments without affecting the DNS service in
> >     case of DNSSEC errors.  It accomplishes that by introducing new DS
> >     Type Digest Algorithms that when used in every record of a DS RRset,
> >     referred to as dry-run DS, signal to validating resolvers that dry-
> >     run DNSSEC is used for the zone.  DNSSEC errors are then reported
> >     with DNS Error Reporting, but any bogus responses to clients are
> >     withheld.  Instead, validating resolvers fallback from dry-run DNSSEC
> >     and provide the response that would have been answered without the
> >     presence of the dry-run DS.  A further EDNS option is presented for
> >     clients to opt-in for dry-run DNSSEC errors and allow for end-to-end
> >     DNSSEC testing.
> >
> > File can be retrieved from:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yorgos-dnsop-dry-run-dnssec/
> >
> > Please reply to this message keeping [email protected] in copy by
> indicating
> > whether you support or not the adoption of this draft as a WG document.
> > Comments to motivate your preference are highly appreciated.
> >
> > Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded of the Intellectual
> > Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79 [2].
> > Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the
> provisions
> > of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of any.
> > Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can
> be
> > found at [3].
> >
> > Thank you.
> > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/
> > [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/
> > [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to