Hi Wes, FWIW, I'm fine with your line of thinking. Just one clarification:
On 12/1/25 17:57, Wes Hardaker wrote:
TL;DR: it's right we should add a requirement that things shouldn't break. But it's wrong that we should specify exactly how in great detail that requirement must be executed. All IMHO.
As for "should add": For CDS/CDNSKEY, that requirement already is in RFC 7344 Section 4.1, and for CSYNC it is in this document (Section 3.2). So, if we settle on your thinking, then nothing would need to be added. Best, Peter _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
