Moin, > I really would like to avoid mentioning RFC9539, as people might look > at this after we got DELEG to work with encrypted transports as the > way how a recursive resolver should discover encrypted transports to > authorities and it clearly is not the way. Also the use of encrypted > transports even between recursive and auth pre dates this RFC. So > IMHO we should just say that now and in the future recursive can use > other transports and then continue with the text you have.
I see your point; Also, I think that removing the explicit reference to RFC9539 does not really take that much away. I adjusted the text to now start with: <=== Note: Please note that this document only explicitly discusses DNS- over-TCP and DNS-over-UDP. However, several other transport methods between recursive and authoritative DNS severs exit, including DNS over various encrypted transports. ===> Thoughts? With best regards, Tobias -- Dr.-Ing. Tobias Fiebig T +31 616 80 98 99 M [email protected] _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
