Hello Philip, > Two tiny changes. > > When starting from the root, there are in general multiple referrals. > Any of > them could cause a failure. This text makes the last referral > special, > which is not needed, but I don't object. > > However, then the text says: "based on the referral," and that should > be "based on a referral," > > There is also "doe snot support". > > Otherwise perfectly fine.
Fixed, thanks. > > > I selected RECOMMENDED here, as it is, essentially, a straight > > forward extension of the RFC9715 recommendations for TCP. However, > > I also see your point and will change RECOMMENDED to MAY: > > I'd like to note here that I'm very curious if setting TCP MSS would > reduce PMTU blackholes. In theory it should help. But it would > require careful research to see how big the problem is today. And if > setting the MSS at either end would improve the situation. Yes, same. Corresponding measurements are on the todo. I know that at least for mail, this can really help (my mailer pins MSS on the outbound interface for... reasons.) I do _not_ think that this needs to be completed (the measurements) before this document progresses. With best regards, Tobias -- Dr.-Ing. Tobias Fiebig T +31 616 80 98 99 M [email protected] _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
