Moin, > I think this should *not* be made normative. May I suggest "needs > to"? (not a strong opinion, it's probably fine as is)
I have no strong feelings about this. If you prefer 'needs to', we can go for that. (part of the PR for your comment) > > I actually did mean page 8, second-to-last paragraph, Section 4.1 > under > Consistency: > "Both IPv4 and IPv6 transports should serve identical DNS data to > ensure a consistent resolution experience across different > network > types." > > I think this should be normative. Agreed. Adjusting it in the PR for your comment: https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-3901bis/pull/31 With best regards, Tobias -- Dr.-Ing. Tobias Fiebig T +31 616 80 98 99 M [email protected] _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
