I guess this is about: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hoffman-rfc9364bis/
which does not have the word "roadmap" in it. I consider that a bug!
So I had to read the agenda + minutes to be sure I was looking at the right
document.
As Paul said at the mic, IPsec also did this... only once.
Will we have to keep revising it? Yes, sure, but.
Is it a failure because IPsec only did this once? No.
IPsec just hasn't revised it *yet* :-)
A new roadmap document every 1-2 decades is fine.
It is definitely worth doing if there is energy.
{If I had my process druthers, there would be a more easily updatable
document like this that actually defined our STDs. It would be able to
reference both Internet Standards, and other documents (which might be in
*decline*)}
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
