Hello, I have read the draft-berra-dnsop-announce-scanner-02 draft and have some remarks.
The indentation of the examples seems wrong, so for those I have submitted a PR on github [1]. # 3.1. Signaling Scanner Presence I think it would be a good idea to add a reference to section 3.4 when talking about publishing information about the scanner. Because when I first read the text I was wondering if the domain mentioned was a website or something else. OLD: ...any additional information about the scanner is published at the domain name "scanner.parent.example." NEW: ...any additional information about the scanner is published at the domain name "scanner.parent.example.", see section 3.4. # 3.4.1. SVCB Key "bootstrap" I was wondering if the mentioned mechanisms in this section should be put in a IANA table. And the "manual" mechanism mentions EPP, which I find not really a manual mechanims, so maybe "other" might be a better name. I hope this helps. [1] https://github.com/johanix/draft-berra-dnsop-announce-scanner/pull/11 -- Stefan Ubbink DNS & Systems Engineer Present: Mon, Tue, Wed, Fri SIDN | Meander 501 | 6825 MD | ARNHEM | The Netherlands T +31 (0)26 352 55 00 https://www.sidn.nl
pgp_2zQmLGfqh.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
