On Oct 17, 2025, at 09:04, Tim Wicinski <[email protected]> wrote: > We asked for agenda time in Montreal, but barring that we'd like to hear what > is still outstanding.
Section 5.1.1.1 is still way too prescriptive, and makes it impossible for random tokens to be typed by a user. In Section 5.1.1., the use case for unique tokens says "adequate uniqueness so as to guarantee a causal relationship between its issuance and its appearance in a DNS record". Even 30 bits of randomness (1 in a billion) is sufficient for that in many cases. The reference to RFC 4086 is also irrelevant to many use cases described in Section 5.1.1. I propose that either Section 5.1.1.1 be removed or, if the WG thinks that this needs to be shown, it should be expanded to an example of using a 10-digit number. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
