> On 19 Oct 2025, at 04:39, Viktor Dukhovni <[email protected]> wrote: > > My message to the WG is in essence to be sparing in defining RRTYPEs > with extensible field subtypes.
I thought this WG decided a long time ago that subtyping was bad. It didn't get written up as an RFC though. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
