Hi Vijay, Thank you for your review! I've included all your suggestions (but used "ideal" instead of "normal" operating conditions): https://github.com/peterthomassen/draft-ietf-dnsop-cds-consistency/commit/53d48b76d83cb09fb1cc3f940764dbdc23a1a086
A new revision will be submitted after Last Call has ended. Best, Peter On 10/15/25 18:08, Vijay Gurbani via Datatracker wrote:
Document: draft-ietf-dnsop-cds-consistency Title: Clarifications on CDS/CDNSKEY and CSYNC Consistency Reviewer: Vijay Gurbani Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>. Document: draft-ietf-dnsop-cds-consistency-09 Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani Review Date: 2025-10-15 IETF LC End Date: 2025-10-29 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: This I-D is ready to be published as a Standards Track RFC. Major issues: 0 Minor issues: 0 Nits/editorial comments: 3 - Abstract: s/parent-side entities has to/parent-side entities have to/ OR s/parent-side entities has to/parent-side entity has to/ - Abstract: s/nameservers, before/nameservers before/ - Section 1: s/works fine when all is in order./works well under normal operating scenarios./ _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
-- Like our community service? 💛 Please consider donating at https://desec.io/ deSEC e.V. Möckernstraße 74 10965 Berlin Germany Vorstandsvorsitz: Nils Wisiol Registergericht: AG Berlin (Charlottenburg) VR 37525 _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
