Moin, On Fri, 2025-08-01 at 22:03 -0500, Nick Buraglio wrote: > The use of the term "preferred" could be confusing here and I would > argue that defining it is very context specific. Suggest quantifying > "preferred" to add some context or re-wording that sentence. While > perhaps a somewhat edge case, I could see someone reading that and > applying the context of source address selection and being confused > by behavior. You clarify this a bit in section 4.3, but perhaps it > could be clarified higher in the doc? > Section 4.2
Reworded to: ... and the progressing deployment of IPv6, IPv4 and IPv6 have become comaprably relevant. > If a recursive DNS resolver runs in a network that uses XLAT > [RFC6877], and the recursive DNS resolver is aware of the used PREF64 > [RFC6146], it SHOULD synthesize mapped IPv6 addresses for remote > > Suggest re-wording this to something like > If a recursive DNS resolver operates in a network that uses > XLAT [RFC6877], and the recursive DNS resolver is aware of the > PREF64 [RFC6146] in use in its administrative domain, .... Changed accordingly, thx! > > Section 4.3 > (DHCPv4, DHCPv6, SLAAC). > > Should these be defined, referenced, or at least explained? PREF64 > and XLAT RFC are referenced in section 4.2. Added corresponding references. Thanks! With best regards, Tobias > -- Dr.-Ing. Tobias Fiebig T +31 616 80 98 99 M [email protected] Pronouns: he/him/his _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
