Hi everyone,

After some more side discussions in Madrid, this draft takes a slightly 
different approach: it uses a registry of incident databases, rather than 
resolvers.

Feedback much appreciated.

Cheers,


> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: [email protected]
> Subject: New Version Notification for 
> draft-nottingham-public-resolver-errors-02.txt
> Date: 8 August 2025 at 9:31:05 am AEST
> To: "David Adrian" <[email protected]>, "Mark Nottingham" <[email protected]>
> 
> A new version of Internet-Draft draft-nottingham-public-resolver-errors-02.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Mark Nottingham and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> 
> Name:     draft-nottingham-public-resolver-errors
> Revision: 02
> Title:    DNS Filtering Details for Applications
> Date:     2025-08-07
> Group:    Individual Submission
> Pages:    8
> URL:      
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-nottingham-public-resolver-errors-02.txt
> Status:   
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nottingham-public-resolver-errors/
> HTML:     
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-nottingham-public-resolver-errors-02.html
> HTMLized: 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-nottingham-public-resolver-errors
> Diff:     
> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-nottingham-public-resolver-errors-02
> 
> Abstract:
> 
>   [I-D.ietf-dnsop-structured-dns-error] introduces structured error
>   data for DNS responses that have been filtered.  This specification
>   allows more specific details of filtering incidents to be conveyed.
> 
> Discussion Venues
> 
>   This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.
> 
>   Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at
>   https://github.com/mnot/public-resolver-errors.
> 
> 
> 
> The IETF Secretariat
> 
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to