On 25. 07. 25 13:03, Joe Abley wrote:
Hi Johan!
Regarding draft-berra-dnsop-announce-scanner:
I think reusing a port number field to mean a timer in units chosen to be
useful within the dimensions of the port number is a bit horrendous. Reusing
old parameters that are well-established but poorly used has been done many
times, and I think there are lots of eamples of such things being good ideas.
In this case the reuse is being proposed for a field that is far from
well-established, of which we have no real operational experience and in fact
for which the specification has not even been published. This is madness, I
think.
I don't know procedurally how we would pull a consensus document from the RFC
editor queue and put it back into the machine, but I think we should try if we
can.
I agree with all the points above. Worth a try to fix this properly
before it explodes into someone's face.
--
Petr Špaček
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
