On Wed, 2025-07-09 at 12:58 +0530, Shreyas Zare wrote: > > The another thing to add here is that a resolver which implements RFC 9539 > will have issues implementing opportunistic-SVCB-DoT along with it. The > resolver would anyways be probing DoT 853 without the SVCB signaling and when > there is an explicit SVCB signal, it will be essentially doing the same - > probe for DoT 853. I do not see how it is an improvement to RFC 9539.
A resolver implementer or operator might choose to not waste the cycles on opportunistic, if a somewhat reliable signal is available - especially if that signal covers 3 protocols instead of just DoT. Kind regards, -- Peter van Dijk PowerDNS.com B.V. - https://www.powerdns.com/ _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
