On 22 Jul 2025, at 17:41, Petr Špaček <[email protected]> wrote: > Having said that, I violently disagree with this: > >> Because non-existence is a cacheable signal and unreachable is not. > Sorry but this statement is as incorrect as it gets.
Thank you for the correction! No violence detected or required :-) I think that in this case we are not actually talking about an unreachable server; we are talking about a server for which addresses cannot be resolved, so there is actually no ability to tell whether you can reach anything or not. So my answer was not very helpful. Thanks again! Joe _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
