Dear dnsop WG,
I submitted draft-fujiwara-dnsop-dns-upper-limit-values-03.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fujiwara-dnsop-dns-upper-limit-values/
Please review it.
If you find this draft useful, I'd like your feedback on how to proceed.
I'm also looking for collaborators and contributors.
I have attempted to respond to the comments I received via email in
March to the best of my ability.
These are changes between -02 and -03.
- added "3. Background" section and moved descriptive texts.
- changed the proposed limits primarily to those that are already implemented
by some implementations today, and related limits.
- added new term "Gluelessness".
- added new text: [djbdns] allows three levels of gluelessness.
- current proposed upper limits
+==============================================+=============+
| Name | upper limit |
+==============================================+=============+
| number of RRs in an RRSet | 100 |
+----------------------------------------------+-------------+
| number of NS RRs in a delegation | 13 |
+----------------------------------------------+-------------+
| number of glue RRs in a delegation | 26 |
+----------------------------------------------+-------------+
| number of DS RRs in a delegation | 8 |
+----------------------------------------------+-------------+
| number of DNSKEY RRs in an RRSet | 8 |
+----------------------------------------------+-------------+
| number of RRSIG RRs for each name and type | 8 |
+----------------------------------------------+-------------+
| number of CNAME/DNAME chains | 9 |
+----------------------------------------------+-------------+
| number of levels of gluelessness delegations | 3 |
+----------------------------------------------+-------------+
Regards,
--
Kazunori Fujiwara, JPRS <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
